Measures of Text Difficulty: Testing their Predictive Value for Grade Levels and Student Performance
NA (site), NA (city),
This study assessed the capabilities of six text difficulty metrics to predict reference measures of text difficulty. The six metrics were as follows: Lexile (MetaMetrics), ATOS (Renaissance), Degrees of Reading Power: DRP Analyzer (Questar Assessment, Inc.), REAP (Carnegie Mellon University), SourceRater (Educational Testing Service), and the Pearson Reading Maturity Metric (Pearson Knowledge Technologies). Additionally, the study included a seventh metric (Coh-Metrix, University of Memphis) that provides multiple indices of text difficulty. All of the metrics were found to be reliably, and often highly, correlated with grade level and student performance-based measures of text difficulty across a variety of text sets, and across a variety of reference measures.
AUTHORS: Jessica Nelson, Charles Perfetti, David Liben, and Meredith Liben.
The full report is available online.
Results informed the supplement to Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy that is available online.
The citation: Nelson, J., Perfetti, C., Liben, D., & Liben, M. (2012). Measures of text difficulty: Testing their predictive value for grade levels and student performance. Technical Report to the Gates Foundation.
For information about research not available electronically, please email us at email@example.com.