Anderson School District One in Williamston, South Carolina, has many high-performing students but is a low-funded district, meaning leaders must be selective about what they invest in and must thoroughly vet all tools to ensure they will be impactful. At the beginning of the 2022–2023 school year, Anderson One switched assessment programs to begin using Renaissance Star Assessments in order to access detailed information about students’ knowledge and mastery of standards-based skills. Shortly thereafter, the district added Freckle for Math and ELA, as well as Lalilo. K–5 students in the district have seen their growth scores soar using these Renaissance tools. The full study is available online: <https://renaissance.widen.net/s/wjbswknhc2/r69052>.

From the abstract: "Academic screener tools are commonly used within the context of multitiered systems of support, and it is expected that they have a high standard of technical adequacy, including reliability and validity evidence. In United States school systems, there are large numbers of students who speak languages other than English with varying levels of proficiency, and it is imperative that well-developed academic screening tools be accessible to active bilingual users/users of English (ABLE) in languages beyond English. This review evaluated the translation process, norming data, and National Center on Intensive Interventions (NCII) standards of academic screening tools that were available in the fall 2023 in early literacy, reading, and math in languages other than English. Information was coded using a rigorous, double-coding process. Findings revealed that academic screening tools for ABLE students are available only in English and Spanish. Very few academic screeners met development criteria for translated measures or met convincing evidence standards established by the NCII. Academic screening conducted in languages other than English is severely constrained by limited availability of high-quality measures. Additional effort should be devoted to developing new measures and appropriately translating and trans-adapting existing measures for ABLE students." Includes Star Alfabetización temprana, Star CBM Lectura, Star Lectura, and Star Matemáticas Citation: Huenergarde, M. C., Floyd, R. G., Harris, B., & Moreno, J. (2026). A systematic review of academic screening tools for active bilingual learners/users of English. Psychology in the Schools, 63(2), 314–331.

"Trends in student outcome measures: The role of individualized Lalilo practice" was independently reviewed and certified by Instructure to meet ESSA Tier 3 standards.

Executive Summary: "Early literacy screening plays a critical role in identifying students who may be at risk for reading difficulties. However, most widely used screening tools were designed and normed within monolingual English-speaking populations, limiting their utility when applied to multilingual learners. This white paper presents findings from a study examining the use of Rapid Automatic Naming (RAN) within dual language contexts, with a specific focus on Spanish/English multilingual students. While Star CBM Lectura RAN benchmarks were developed using a large, multi-state norming sample, the findings presented in this paper draw exclusively from a focused study conducted in two dual language school districts in Oregon. Although both districts offer PK–12 dual language programs, the study sample consisted specifically of students in Kindergarten through Grade 3. Using Star CBM Lectura RAN measures, the study examined student performance across four RAN task types: colors, pictures, letters, and numbers, and analyzed language response patterns alongside teacher feedback collected during administration. Results demonstrate that RAN performance varies systematically by language of response. Students responding only in English showed faster naming speeds, followed by Spanish-only responses, while responses using both languages yielded the lowest scores. These differences reflect linguistic structure, and processing demands rather than reading ability or language proficiency, a finding consistent with cross-linguistic research on RAN and reading development (Georgiou et al., 2008; Landerl et al., 2013). Teacher feedback further highlighted the importance of interpreting RAN data through a bilingual lens, noting patterns of cross-language substitution, task-specific difficulty, and instructional relevance. The findings suggest that RAN can be a valuable early indicator of reading risk for multilingual learners when interpreted appropriately. However, equitable use requires responsive-to-language benchmarks, careful attention to task demands, and professional learning that supports educators in distinguishing bilingual processing patterns from indicators of reading difficulty." The study is available online: <https://docs.renaissance.com/R69049>.

Early literacy practice with Lalilo was associated with higher levels of growth in general literacy achievement. Students who used Lalilo more intensively and for a longer period experienced the most growth in their literacy skills. Less intense and less frequent use of Lalilo was associated with relatively less achievement growth, but even lighter use was associated with more growth relative to students who did not use the program at all. These results remained consistent across struggling readers, English language Learners, and students from Title I schools.The full report is available online: <https://docs.renaissance.com/R63694>.

From the Introduction: "To provide optimal power and usefulness within our Star Assessments and many of our practice products, Renaissance takes a unique approach to content creation through the development of custom learning progressions. In general, learning progressions are descriptions of successively more sophisticated ways of thinking about key disciplinary concepts and practices across multiple grades, which outline intermediate steps toward expertise (Pellegrino, 2011). Learning progressions lay out in words and examples what it means to move toward more expert understanding (Wilson & Bertenthal 2005) in a subject area. While not unlike a traditional scope and sequence, learning progressions are far more thoughtfully developed and emphasize a holistic, cross-grades focus."The Full Report is available online: <https://renaissance.widen.net/s/jdm9kgx5cw/780549-lpfocusskills-whitepaper>.

From the introduction: "In the spring of 2024, Renaissance undertook a special study to gather further reliability and validity evidence for its four Star CBM rapid automatic naming (RAN) measures. These four assessments measure a student’s ability to rapid name colors (Rapid Color Naming (RCN), pictures (Rapid Picture Naming (RPN)), letters (Rapid Letter Naming (RLN)), and numbers (Rapid Number Naming (RNN)). The four RAN measures each have two test forms and are offered in grades K through 3."The study is available online: <https://docs.renaissance.com/R67673>.

This document contains updated classifaction accuracy for Star Early Literacy.The study is available online: <https://docs.renaissance.com/R67671>.

From the study: "The purpose of this report was to evaluate the Lalilo software program. Three research questions guided the current study.1. Do students in classrooms using Lalilo experience more growth in literacy skills relative to students in classrooms that do not use the program? Overall, students in schools that used Lalilo grew at a greater rate than students in schools that did not use Lalilo.2. Do classrooms that follow best practice guidelines for the program confer greater student growth relative to classrooms that do not? More specific measures of fidelity or usage benchmarks may shed light on the relationship between adherence to best practice guidelines and student growth in early literacy skills.3. To what degree is the intensity in which Lalilo is used (e.g., number of lessons completed / number of minutes program was used) related to the magnitude of growth in literacy skills amongst students in classrooms that use the program?Increasing the number of minutes or days spent using Lalilo was not critical to the improvement in weekly growth of early literacy skills. Instead increasing the number of learning objectives validated resulted in the largest improvements".Citation: Van Norman, E. R., & Forcht, E. R. (2024). An evaluation of the impact of the Lalilo software program: Research report prepared for Renaissance Learning. Center for Promoting Research to Practice, Lehigh University.The study is available online: <https://docs.renaissance.com/R67557>.

FastBridge Adaptive Math (aMath) has been rated highly by the National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) as academic screening assessment. The Full Review is available online: <https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/ascreening>.

FastBridge earlyMath Composite has been rated highly by the National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) as academic screening assessment. The Full Review is available online: <https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/ascreening>.

This technical manual is a compendium of all relevant information about design, test security, content specification, equating and scale development, reliability and measure precision, validity, norming, and score definitions for Star CBM Math.Email research@renaissance.com to request a copy of the technical manual from the Renaissance Research Department.

This technical manual is a compendium of all relevant information about design, test security, content specification, equating and scale development, reliability and measure precision, validity, norming, and score definitions for Star CBM Reading.Email research@renaissance.com to request a copy of the technical manual from the Renaissance Research Department.